<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE, Chevron to Build World’s Largest Carbon Sequestration Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthandindustry.com/2009/10/ge-chevron-to-build-world%e2%80%99s-largest-co2-sequestration-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2009/10/ge-chevron-to-build-world%e2%80%99s-largest-co2-sequestration-project/</link>
	<description>Exploring sustainable business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 01:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Milton</title>
		<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2009/10/ge-chevron-to-build-world%e2%80%99s-largest-co2-sequestration-project/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthandindustry.com/?p=1065#comment-490</guid>
		<description>I accept that the fossil fuel super-tanker can&#039;t be turned around on the head of a pin.

But opening up one of the world&#039;s largest natural gas fields for exploitation and then using it to sequester carbon sounds like a long term project, not a stop gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I accept that the fossil fuel super-tanker can&#8217;t be turned around on the head of a pin.</p>
<p>But opening up one of the world&#8217;s largest natural gas fields for exploitation and then using it to sequester carbon sounds like a long term project, not a stop gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Reyes</title>
		<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2009/10/ge-chevron-to-build-world%e2%80%99s-largest-co2-sequestration-project/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Reyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthandindustry.com/?p=1065#comment-489</guid>
		<description>We are going to use fossil fuels for at least 15 more years. Natural gas is the least contaminant of these fuels. So why not a carbon sequestration project?

I know we should be focusing on renewable energy but is not possible to change the entire energy scheme from one day to another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are going to use fossil fuels for at least 15 more years. Natural gas is the least contaminant of these fuels. So why not a carbon sequestration project?</p>
<p>I know we should be focusing on renewable energy but is not possible to change the entire energy scheme from one day to another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Milton</title>
		<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2009/10/ge-chevron-to-build-world%e2%80%99s-largest-co2-sequestration-project/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Milton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthandindustry.com/?p=1065#comment-484</guid>
		<description>Hmpf.  Sorry but I can&#039;t get too excited, and my cynical bell goes off.

GE and Chevron building a carbon sequestration project to put carbon back into somewhere we&#039;ve just got carbon out from ...?  Well, I suppose I should expect nothing more.

Carbon sequestration really should be taken off the table.  A bit like nuclear waste, it&#039;s a legacy headache for future generations (or poor impoverished Africans).

Not impressed, but not surprised either I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmpf.  Sorry but I can&#8217;t get too excited, and my cynical bell goes off.</p>
<p>GE and Chevron building a carbon sequestration project to put carbon back into somewhere we&#8217;ve just got carbon out from &#8230;?  Well, I suppose I should expect nothing more.</p>
<p>Carbon sequestration really should be taken off the table.  A bit like nuclear waste, it&#8217;s a legacy headache for future generations (or poor impoverished Africans).</p>
<p>Not impressed, but not surprised either I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: earthandindustry.com @ 2010-09-10 11:48:35 -->