<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FloDesign Raises $42.8 Million for Jet-Inspired Wind Turbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://earthandindustry.com/2010/01/flodesign-raises-42-8-million-for-jet-inspired-wind-turbine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2010/01/flodesign-raises-42-8-million-for-jet-inspired-wind-turbine/</link>
	<description>Sustainability, Green Business and CSR News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim B</title>
		<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2010/01/flodesign-raises-42-8-million-for-jet-inspired-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthandindustry.com/?p=1031#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>I think the 3-4 times more efficient claim is based on the land area needed to produce a given amount of electricity. That is, the generators are more efficient and require a much smaller footprint so you can pack more generators into a given area.  So one acre of a flodesign system would produce 3-4 times more electricity than one acre of the conventional three-bladed generators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the 3-4 times more efficient claim is based on the land area needed to produce a given amount of electricity. That is, the generators are more efficient and require a much smaller footprint so you can pack more generators into a given area.  So one acre of a flodesign system would produce 3-4 times more electricity than one acre of the conventional three-bladed generators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francois Gagnon</title>
		<link>http://earthandindustry.com/2010/01/flodesign-raises-42-8-million-for-jet-inspired-wind-turbine/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>
		<dc:creator>Francois Gagnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://earthandindustry.com/?p=1031#comment-2444</guid>
		<description>I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT!!

It is thru that the 35% average efficiency of tri-blades wind turbines is not outstanding. On other hand pretend to produce 3 or 4 time more energy means to transform 105 to 140% of the kinetics energy of wind in electricity, this is just impossible!!!

By the way, what is the expected noise level at the exit of a jet like turbine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT!!</p>
<p>It is thru that the 35% average efficiency of tri-blades wind turbines is not outstanding. On other hand pretend to produce 3 or 4 time more energy means to transform 105 to 140% of the kinetics energy of wind in electricity, this is just impossible!!!</p>
<p>By the way, what is the expected noise level at the exit of a jet like turbine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: earthandindustry.com @ 2012-02-08 20:48:33 -->
